Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus B75M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140707
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '14 at 12:37
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 89.9 2-Core 176 60% 133 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 260 35% 260 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250X 12,863 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B A002) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1001.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 24.3 18% 21.7 fps	MRender 15.3 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 21 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SH920 2.5 128GB 854 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (64) Unknown 100 100 124677 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 100 0 (AE) Unknown 253 253 0 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 256 (B2) Unknown 100 100 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 17 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2479 (B5) Unknown 253 253 0 (B6) Unknown 253 100 0 (B7) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BF) G-sense error rate 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 0 107376541730 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 25 (F1) Unknown 100 100 24 (F2) Unknown 100 100 15 (FA) Read error retry rate 253 253 0	83.3% Excellent	Read 513 Write 313 Mixed 387 90% 404 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 22.3 96% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 60.5 119% 241 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 87%
Hitachi HCC545016B9A300 160GB 186 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 149GB free Firmware: PBBV Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 205 205 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 548 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 730 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 547 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 221 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 587 (C2) HDA temperature 161 161 193274642466 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	33.6% Below average	Read 58 Write 59.1 Mixed 55.5 43% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.33 78% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 35%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 2,465 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 763GB free, PID 2320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 101 Write 102 Mixed 58.1 108% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.27 77% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	169x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	112x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	69x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	62x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	38x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x
TA1D0120A 120GBGalaxBench 61%, 4,895 samples	22x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	22x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	29x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results

PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

Feedback

PC Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)