HP Compaq 6720s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6720s  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30D8
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '18 at 11:25
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5670
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Memory 10.2
1-Core 16.2
2-Core 20
9% 15.5 Pts
4-Core 23.5
8-Core 12.9
3% 18.2 Pts
64-Core 10.8
1% 10.8 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
HP(103C 30D8)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 0.15
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.19 fps
Splatting 0.09
0% 0.09 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160827AS 160GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AHC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 50.1
Mixed 51.3
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.29
60% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Samsung M2 Portable 750GB
263GB free, PID 60b5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 23.4
Mixed 15
28% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.26
47% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.63 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 0.7
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 402
10% 402 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback