Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	94.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 REV 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '18 at 20:02
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 94.7 1-Core 92 2-Core 174 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 455 46% 373 Pts	64-Core 455 28% 455 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3794) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.8% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 132 Parallax 113 100% 122 fps	MRender 93.8 Gravity 115 Splatting 100 84% 103 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9965 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2812 (B1) Unknown 98 98 39 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 45 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 26916379001	65.4% Good	Read 352 Write 195 Mixed 237 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 31.2 106% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 76.3 75% 122 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 140GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 82 192983901 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4284 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 26332555015 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 36469 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 37 2566 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 8049 (BC) Unknown 100 96 65565 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 588578850 (C2) HDA temperature 34 49 60129542178 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 34 23 192983901 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 99 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -139736760932748 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3578217675 (F2) Unknown 100 253 442128399	45.1% Average	Read 94.4 Write 62.7 Mixed 72.4 58% 76.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.38 86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 68%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 72GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 86 170532582 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10755 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 194597129 (09) Power-on hours count 37 37 55220 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5455 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 34 639893541 (C2) HDA temperature 37 66 64424509477 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 60 55 235159734 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	34.1% Below average	Read 57.5 Write 61.2 Mixed 68.5 47% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.31 74% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.9% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 11.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.2 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 57.9 69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	160x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	124x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	48x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $546

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16