Biostar TP67B+

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar TP67B+ (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120706
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '18 at 13:43
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 93.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 206 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 382 52% 388 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% MSI(1462 2775) 3GB CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.1.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	37.7% Below average	Lighting 49.1 Reflection 33 Parallax 61.5 40% 47.9 fps	MRender 31.6 Gravity 48.5 Splatting 40.9 33% 40.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4275 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1233 (B1) Unknown 97 97 55 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 43 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 188 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17655968442	68.6% Good	Read 400 Write 336 Mixed 332 79% 356 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 18.7 99% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 35.7 DQ Write 92.7 DQ Mixed 21 28% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 124%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 45GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 5 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2216 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1608 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16587 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7083 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1287 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7083 (C2) HDA temperature 115 75 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 140904 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37.1% Below average	Read 66 Write 62.8 Mixed 62.9 48% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.41 107% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 55%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 44GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 92 92 3370 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 3938 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 20768 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1889 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 87 48 218693645 (C2) HDA temperature 79 44 47597551637 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 90930 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 99 96 388 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	47.8% Average	Read 86.4 Write 80.1 Mixed 74.1 60% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.42 100% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	49.3% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 15.5 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 15.2 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 61.1 65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TP67B+ Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 96%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar TP67B+

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	13x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	6x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	6x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	3x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	2x
TEAML5Lite3D1T 1TBBench 105%, 1,722 samples	2x

RAM
9905403-181.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 46%, 14 samples	5x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GBUnknownBench 51%, 517 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 1,020 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $776

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16