Dell Precision WorkStation T5400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T5400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW203
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110523
Uptime31 Days
Run DateJan 31 '18 at 17:57
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 85.9
40% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 332
30% 251 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4500
Nvidia(10DE 02AF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 309.8
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.31 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAO
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 72.9
Write 79.3
Mixed 76.8
58% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.33
84% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: MJ8O
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 102
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.2
93% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
816GB free
Firmware: MJ8O
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 100
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.21
94% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
646GB free
Firmware: MJ8O
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 100
Write 116
Mixed 108
82% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.22
90% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
54GB free
Firmware: MJ8O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 89.6
Mixed 76.1
64% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.19
52% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 77.8
Write 80.8
Mixed 85.7
62% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.37
90% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.6
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T5400 Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T5400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $172
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback