Acer Aspire M3985

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Aspire M3985 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire M3985
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '16 at 20:12
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 162 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 293 40% 296 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 063D) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.16 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.96 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 644GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 204690152 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 466 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 3864852 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 722 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 223 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 504365086 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3791 (C2) HDA temperature 30 41 42949672990 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 38238093836581 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2329807745 (F2) Unknown 100 253 7312316176	96.7% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 158 Mixed 158 124% 165 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.15 78% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 110766598 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3544 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 452556394 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 8911 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3496 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 27 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 50 537985056 (C2) HDA temperature 32 50 42949672992 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 29 110766598 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -12240656775270 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1290622881 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1562441112
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Samsung HD081GJ 80GB 966 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 74GB free Firmware: GE100-07 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 252 100 0 (03) Spinup time 80 73 3000 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 17554 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 6 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 1392713 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 99 99 9 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 7487 (B8) Unknown 252 252 0 (BB) vendor-specific 89 89 11 (BC) Unknown 252 252 0 (BE) vendor-specific 175 43 26 (C2) HDA temperature 175 43 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 99 99 6 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 252 252 0	42.5% Average	Read 72.2 Write 75.7 Mixed 72.9 56% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.33 79% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.3% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.1 26% 9.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M3985 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3985

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	56x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	35x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	25x

GPU
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	26x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	19x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 47%, 2,338 samples	7x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 3x4GBKingstonBench 35%, 236 samples	6x
HU564404EP0200 2x4GBUnifosaBench 49%, 333 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16