Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '18 at 11:44
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 144
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 468
44% 365 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.4
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 85.9
56% 72.2 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 53.9
Splatting 77.4
54% 63.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
188GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 373
Mixed 401
92% 415 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 38
139% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 71.9
76% 127 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 124%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 487
Write 455
Mixed 478
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 13.6
72% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 63.1
74% 127 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
787GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 161
Mixed 154
123% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.26
111% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-14900CL9-4GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 14.7
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback