MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A94
MotherboardMSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171122
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '18 at 05:42
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 818
82% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 37.1
32% 35.7 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 35.8
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB
217GB free
Firmware: M3CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 482
Mixed 507
112% 504 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 25.5
137% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 35.9
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 27.6
33% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 117%
Samsung SSD 256GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 506
Write 332
Mixed 419
93% 419 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 11
67% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 50.3
DQ Mixed 10.7
15% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 127%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
104GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42% Average
Read 74.9
Write 70.7
Mixed 66.6
53% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.49
140% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 1TB
167GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 62.3
Write 62.3
Mixed 58
78% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.12
51% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 43%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB
112GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.1% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 35.7
Mixed 35.3
46% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.27
74% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 17.2
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94) Builds (Compare 899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $777
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback