Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 5% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.01%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	5.01% Terrible	Memory 6.46 1-Core 17.9 2-Core 15.8 8% 13.4 Pts	4-Core 20.2 8-Core 23.7 3% 22 Pts	64-Core 21.2 1% 21.2 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 5.01% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1C4D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4256 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 1.67 Reflection 2.42 Parallax 2.34 1% 2.14 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.91 2% 2.36 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung BGND3R 31GB 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.9% Very poor	Read 155 Write 29.5 Mixed 34.9 16% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 1.96 28% 9.97 MB/s	DQ Read 38 DQ Write 14.8 DQ Mixed 3.41 9% 18.7 MB/s

Generic 00000 SD Card 16GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 6GB free Firmware: 1.0 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	9.78% Terrible	Read 22.8 Write 9.81 Mixed 13 11% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.71 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.47 230% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.78% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 1x2GB 2,027 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	8.44% Terrible	MC Read 1.1 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 4 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 0.6 5% 1.63 GB/s	Latency 438 9% 438 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.44% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 11%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	2x

SSD
PM871b M.2 2280 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 2,851 samples	1x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	1x

RAM
HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 15%, 2,027 samples	1x
4KTF51264HZ-1G6A1 1x4GBMicronBench 17%, 341 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16