Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '18 at 20:19
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 99.4
1-Core 169
2-Core 337
110% 202 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 908
94% 756 Pts
64-Core 910
56% 910 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 106%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 3133 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Lighting 201
Reflection 209
Parallax 191
164% 200 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 202
Splatting 139
129% 159 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 142%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
477GB free
Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
420% Outstanding
Read 3,796
Write 2,720
Mixed 3,178
718% 3,231 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 70.3
258% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 573
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 248
258% 426 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 420%
Great: 273%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
477GB free
Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 3,787
Write 2,705
Mixed 3,028
705% 3,173 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 46.9
224% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 455
DQ Mixed 39.3
156% 349 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 406%
Great: 273%
Samsung MZVPV128HDGM-00000 128GB
477GB free
Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: Unknown
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
422% Outstanding
Read 3,786
Write 2,749
Mixed 3,021
708% 3,185 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 71.1
260% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 580
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 77.9
179% 374 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 422%
Great: 214%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
477GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 3,767
Write 2,690
Mixed 3,212
716% 3,223 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 66.4
252% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 54.4
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 39.3
52% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 397%
Great: 220%
Intel X25-M 80GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 045C8820 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 248
Write 63
Mixed 61.1
27% 124 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 0.006
56% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.5
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 18.2
20% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 44%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
5.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 209
Mixed 199
157% 208 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 3.34
4K Mixed 0.56
164% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 122%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 48.2
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 33.6
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 53.5
SC Mixed 38.6
114% 40.1 GB/s
Latency 38.9
103% 38.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 126%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,081
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback