Biostar TP67B+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Biostar TP67B+ (all builds)
Memory	7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120706
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '18 at 03:06
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 95.1 1-Core 94.5 2-Core 169 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 235 31% 235 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100 19,960 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1TB free Firmware: CC94 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 765193 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2405 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2415005 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3914 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1338 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 65545 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 69 41 7929030967327 (C2) HDA temperature 31 59 68719476767 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 27 765193 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 37795712211999 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3789536839 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4039937110	40.9% Average	Read 77.2 Write 65.1 Mixed 25.5 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.49 111% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 61%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80 10,362 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 30GB free Firmware: 12.01C01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 169 6441 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6595 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12453 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3858 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 661 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6768 (C2) HDA temperature 114 87 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	27% Poor	Read 47.9 Write 45.7 Mixed 23.2 29% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.32 98% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 51%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 18GB free Firmware: JF100-20 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4480 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11472 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 15903 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6063 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 104699 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 443 (BC) Unknown 100 100 2 (BE) vendor-specific 67 59 688390177 (C2) HDA temperature 65 56 738721827 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 104699 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	33% Below average	Read 56.1 Write 58.9 Mixed 38.7 38% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.39 82% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 42%
Seagate ST3160212SCE 160GB 1,489 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.ACB Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 2260356 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5198 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 143097377 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7037 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6697 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 47 588316707 (C2) HDA temperature 35 53 68719476771 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 63 51 127930243 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	29% Poor	Read 44.2 Write 56.8 Mixed 36.2 34% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.29 57% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 9905402-664.A00LF 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.1% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 18.9 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 16.3 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 56.7 71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TP67B+ Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 96%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar TP67B+

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	13x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	6x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	6x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	3x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	2x
TEAML5Lite3D1T 1TBBench 105%, 1,722 samples	2x

RAM
9905403-181.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 46%, 14 samples	5x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GBUnknownBench 51%, 517 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 1,020 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $776

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16