Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '18 at 18:35
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 133
58% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 429
40% 336 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 88
56% 72.9 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 54.6
Splatting 77.6
54% 64.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
188GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 476
Write 373
Mixed 400
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 37.1
133% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 65.1
70% 117 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 124%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 492
Write 427
Mixed 485
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 13.7
72% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 61.2
70% 120 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
787GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 138
Write 153
Mixed 141
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.26
113% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-14900CL9-4GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback