User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGBT___ NVDAACPI
MotherboardGigabyte M55S-S3
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '18 at 17:43
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 66
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 77.1
40% 60.8 Pts
4-Core 76
8-Core 76.3
10% 76.2 Pts
64-Core 73.1
4% 73.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1300
Sapphire(174B 3000) 512MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD251HJ 250GB-$39
227GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 96
Mixed 87
68% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.46
4K Mixed 0.52
126% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%
Samsung SP1213N 120GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TL100-30 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 47.9
Write 46.5
Mixed 28.6
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.39
91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 512, 512 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback