Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '18 at 14:38
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$462 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Memory 83.3 1-Core 137 2-Core 276 90% 166 Pts	4-Core 558 8-Core 1,099 98% 828 Pts	64-Core 1,920 119% 1,920 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2527 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 156 Parallax 132 116% 143 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 139 Splatting 115 101% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 2,111 Write 1,091 Mixed 1,291 330% 1,498 MB/s	4K Read 58.7 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 29.6 201% 76 MB/s	DQ Read 59.4 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 193 124% 138 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 612GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 63 86933574 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 398 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 28839274 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 817 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 391 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 60 421003288 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 399 (C2) HDA temperature 24 2 8589934616 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 10 1 86933574 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 79727477916465 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6500522186 (F2) Unknown 100 253 6111577357	96.2% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 158 Mixed 162 125% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.24 79% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 112%
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40 13,598 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 46GB free Firmware: 0006HPM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 88 26409709 (03) Spinup time 100 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 920 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 34385301450 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1106 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 37 919 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 1 1 266 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 82 76 303169554 (BF) G-sense error rate 78 51 370475030 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 82 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 28 (C2) HDA temperature 99 40 77309414243 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 22 100 22 (C5) Current pending sector count 58 45 26409709 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 -17669495455744 (F1) Unknown 200 200 0 (F2) Unknown 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	32.6% Below average	Read 57.4 Write 56 Mixed 58 43% 57.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.38 82% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FBD 2x8GB 1,777 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.1% Good	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 17.8 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 11.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	493x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	260x
Core i7-7740XIntel $281Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	168x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	60x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	55x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16