| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 9.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170705 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 28 '18 at 18:56 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
32.8%
Below average
|
31% 46.2 Pts
|
11% 86.8 Pts
|
6% 99.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gigabyte(1458 3536) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.65
|
9.8%
Terrible
|
9% 11 fps
|
11% 13.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
55.8%
Above average
|
74% 98.4 MB/s
|
91% 0.92 MB/s
| |
|
|
39%
Below average
|
50% 66.1 MB/s
|
32% 0.28 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
31.5%
Below average
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
11% 3.9 GB/s
|
27% 150 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,409 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 211x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 186x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 167x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 176x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 167x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |