Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140116
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '18 at 16:12
Run Duration	394 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G860-$73 3,842 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G860 @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 82 1-Core 55.8 2-Core 108 52% 82.1 Pts	4-Core 129 8-Core 137 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 19.8 18% 19.7 fps	MRender 24.6 Gravity 23.1 Splatting 16.6 17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 376GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G37R5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 100 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 33 (64) Unknown 100 100 116608 (65) Unknown 100 100 15776 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 25 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1515 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 23 100 137440067607 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 311 (EA) Unknown 100 100 138 (F1) Unknown 100 100 239 (F2) Unknown 100 100 235 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	48.3% Average	Read 376 Write 222 Mixed 198 58% 265 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 8.96 64% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 34.7 DQ Mixed 8.84 13% 23 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 70GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 87611056 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 534 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 204994219 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 8982 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 453 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 80 51 336592916 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 43 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 84 84 33765 (C2) HDA temperature 20 49 60129542164 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -36039070572020 (F1) Unknown 100 253 21200980542 (F2) Unknown 100 253 33462591227	77.7% Very good	Read 140 Write 131 Mixed 79.5 87% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.34 88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 112%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB 1,393 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 28GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	4.8% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 5.26 Mixed 7.01 11% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.25 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.001 12% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.8% Great: 11%
USB DISK 3.0 126GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 23.6 Write 8.08 Mixed 6.93 13% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.78 42% 3.78 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905402-475.A00LF 2x2GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14.5 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.2 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	348x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	168x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	122x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	96x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	59x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	23x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	34x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $424

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16