Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 116% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus Z97-PRO GAMER (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '18 at 12:13
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 95.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 224 85% 147 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 683 70% 563 Pts	64-Core 684 42% 684 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2780 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	131% Outstanding	Lighting 186 Reflection 193 Parallax 179 152% 186 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 176 Splatting 125 114% 141 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160 11,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 659 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1607 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 38 (A3) Unknown 100 100 713 (94) Unknown 100 100 137553 (95) Unknown 100 100 1864 (96) Unknown 100 100 1725 (97) Unknown 100 100 1834 (A4) Unknown 100 100 32992 (A5) Unknown 100 100 79 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4 (A7) Unknown 100 100 26 (A9) Unknown 100 100 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 71 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 32019503448088 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 277120 (F2) Unknown 100 100 386366 (F5) Unknown 100 100 389718 (F6) Unknown 100 100 550212 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	74.3% Very good	Read 482 Write 244 Mixed 266 73% 331 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 53 4K Mixed 24.1 101% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 46.6 80% 159 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 95%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 178 5533 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6573 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11602 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3565 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 599 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5973 (C2) HDA temperature 129 102 21 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 296 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	72.8% Very good	Read 127 Write 126 Mixed 124 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 2.57 4K Mixed 0.27 114% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,729 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 449GB free Firmware: JC4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 111 (03) Spinup time 128 128 25789399287 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4825 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 137 137 35 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10100 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3298 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5690 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5690 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 201864511515 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.1% Good	Read 114 Write 96.2 Mixed 102 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.22 69% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 64%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55 14,577 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 297GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 84 39657327 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9667 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 398272532 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 30535 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6392 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 49 387252247 (C2) HDA temperature 23 51 51539607575 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 62 49 67124826 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 95 248 5	43.7% Average	Read 74.6 Write 77.5 Mixed 75.2 57% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.43 96% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 44%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB 2,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1TB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 40.4 Write 39 Mixed 39.2 51% 39.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.2 75% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB 11,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 24.6 78% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 23.7 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 54.6 73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,398x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	541x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	293x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	454x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	220x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	181x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	187x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	74x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	108x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $648

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16