User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardSupermicro X8DAL
Memory21.1 GB free of 24.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '18 at 05:10
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 165
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 577
55% 453 Pts
64-Core 1,257
78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 159
Parallax 139
101% 141 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 147
Splatting 118
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.6% Very good
Read 267
Write 236
Mixed 245
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 36.9
122% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 101
99% 157 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 124%
WD WD1600HLFS-60G6U2 160GB
298GB free
Firmware: 04.04V03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 228
Mixed 169
151% 203 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 4.43
4K Mixed 0.85
217% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 126%
Great: 68%
WD WD1600HLFS-60G6U2 160GB
298GB free
Firmware: 04.04V03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 215
Mixed 188
152% 203 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 4.62
4K Mixed 0.94
233% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 121%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 MXIC 25L3205 60GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 20.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback