Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '18 at 22:11
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 76
2-Core 143
60% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 471
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 38.6
27% 34.1 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 34
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 255
Write 106
Mixed 148
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 14
70% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 85.6
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 30
42% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 73%
WD WD1600AVVS-63L2B0 160GB
9GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 39.8
Write 41.8
Mixed 49.5
33% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.31
84% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 44%
Mass Storage Device 16GB
10GB free, PID 125c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
9.63% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 15.2
Mixed 14.1
20% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.27
4K Write 0.82
4K Mixed 0.59
64% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.63%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF 99U5471-025.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback