Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 24 '18 at 11:15
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 144
58% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 724
63% 539 Pts
64-Core 952
59% 952 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 854B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.4% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 113
Parallax 111
83% 108 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 88
76% 93.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe M.2 256GB-$208
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 661
Write 550
Mixed 413
120% 541 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 32.5
122% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 58.4
73% 135 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 129%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
20GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 504
Write 31
Mixed 107
46% 214 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 3.47
4K Mixed 24.7
59% 15 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 107%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223
29GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 87
Write 83.7
Mixed 84.7
64% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.25
95% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 98%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
7GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 79.1
Write 73.5
Mixed 67
55% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.21
72% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
4GB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 117
Write 102
Mixed 97.4
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.16
52% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 96%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
1GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 118
Write 122
Mixed 116
90% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.53
4K Mixed 0.4
116% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2800 C14 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 38.3
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,103
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback