Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

6 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 4,676 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 145 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 579 51% 434 Pts	64-Core 903 56% 903 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) Ram: 4GB, Driver: 344.11 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Lighting 72 Reflection 71.3 Parallax 64.9 59% 69.4 fps	MRender 75.3 Gravity 65.6 Splatting 56.9 53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB 9,379 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3D1Q Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.1% Below average	Read 132 Write 106 Mixed 128 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 16.5 59% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 74.2 DQ Write 65.1 DQ Mixed 42.6 39% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 80%
Hitachi HUS156030VLS600 300GB 589 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 12GB free Firmware: HPH1 Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 115 Write 113 Mixed 114 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.41 4K Write 3.12 4K Mixed 1.11 240% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 107%
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$72 1,032 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2GB free Firmware: HPS1 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 119 Write 125 Mixed 117 91% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.37 4K Write 3.41 4K Mixed 1.09 241% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 66GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	45% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 14.7 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	187x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16