Asrock 990FX Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140605
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '18 at 05:56
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 75.9 2-Core 152 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 465 46% 373 Pts	64-Core 477 30% 477 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.2 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	49.5% Average	Lighting 59.4 Reflection 70.4 Parallax 82.5 48% 70.7 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 64.1 Splatting 57.3 52% 64 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-agil ITY2 120GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 81GB free Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 10229904 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 28776280920241 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 416 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 133 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 105 99 10229904 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3904 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3200 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3200 (F2) Unknown 0 0 16000	45.3% Average	Read 201 Write 96.9 Mixed 118 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 14.9 93% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 92.7 DQ Mixed 33.3 43% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 47%
Ocz-agil ITY2 60GB 33GB free Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 99 7587618 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 56152402447982 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 210 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 77 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 104 99 7587618 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 640 (EA) Unknown 0 0 512 (F1) Unknown 0 0 512 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2432	41.2% Average	Read 184 Write 59.2 Mixed 98.2 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 15.1 89% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 69.3 DQ Mixed 27.6 39% 73.3 MB/s

Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 32125 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 248 (B1) Unknown 97 97 89 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 27 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 121 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20040413112	64.6% Good	Read 493 Write 118 Mixed 160 56% 257 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 18.9 107% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 98.5 DQ Mixed 53.9 64% 114 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0. 4x8GB 587 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.4% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 17 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	37x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	5x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	3x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	3x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
T25 31TBTeamBench 58%, 15 samples	3x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	4x
99U5403-159.A01LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 52%, 29 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $813

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16