DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '18 at 03:28
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 123
59% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 351
36% 289 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 65.9
61% 72.1 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 72.3
59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
461GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 95.8
Write 72.4
Mixed 73.6
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.41
101% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
455GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 92.4
Mixed 81.7
69% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.38
98% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
135GB free
Firmware: SD17 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 85.5
Mixed 85.3
66% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.33
88% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 70%
TOSHIBA HDWN180 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.9% Very good
Read 218
Write 182
Mixed 63.8
180% 155 MB/s
4K Read 2.63
4K Write 0.64
4K Mixed 0.31
42% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x1GB
6 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback