Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X99X Killer (all builds)
Memory	21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160701
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '18 at 15:13
Run Duration	305 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 89.2 1-Core 111 2-Core 214 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 678 66% 539 Pts	64-Core 893 55% 893 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Zotac(19DA 2370) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.6% Below average	Lighting 46.2 Reflection 53 Parallax 43.3 38% 47.5 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 44.1 Splatting 45.7 40% 49.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300. 960GB 573 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 750GB free Firmware: SAFM12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2242 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 928 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 193 193 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 280 (C2) HDA temperature 58 47 227634446378	58.7% Above average	Read 497 Write 260 Mixed 267 75% 341 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 7.82 64% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 33.6 DQ Mixed 37 45% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 103%
Apple B35ACXBA9TA 512GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM2.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1315 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1639 (A0) Unknown 100 100 7 (A1) Unknown 100 100 42 (A3) Unknown 100 100 27 (A4) Unknown 100 100 80407 (A5) Unknown 100 100 137 (A6) Unknown 100 100 34 (A7) Unknown 100 100 79 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 98 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 90 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 165 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 57 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 941 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 14 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 7 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 8999 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 726034 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5384309 (F5) Unknown 100 100 1286512	96.1% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 425 Mixed 462 104% 469 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 34.8 125% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 72.8 100% 184 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 96%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 19GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 9732 (03) Spinup time 181 178 5941 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8246 (05) Reallocated sector count 118 118 653 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5603 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7480 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 275 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 148 148 157688 (C2) HDA temperature 106 92 44 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 421 (C5) Current pending sector count 198 195 625 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 199 196 444 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 181 1 3948	11.6% Very poor	Read 1.1 Write 39.5 Mixed 28.1 18% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.15 4K Write 0.07 4K Mixed 0.13 22% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB-$165 7,179 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	115% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 46.5 MC Mixed 44.6 129% 45.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 21.9 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	143x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	42x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	18x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	18x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
BL8G36C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GBUnknownBench 96%, 5,257 samples	12x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 87%, 2,702 samples	9x
DDR4 2800 2OZ 4x8GBUnknownBench 86%, 829 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $923

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16