PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P31-DS3L (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20071225 |
Uptime | 1.5 Days |
Run Date | Jan 23 '18 at 11:27 |
Run Duration | 95 Seconds |
Run User | BIH-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E7200-$14
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
40.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 84A9) 3GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1499 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.4%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
45.5%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 10x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 8x |
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 6x |
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 5x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |