Asus M32CD

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus M32CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '18 at 03:53
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 106 2-Core 205 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 398 53% 399 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4877 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.66% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 8.81 Parallax 6.06 5% 6.99 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 5.37 Splatting 12.7 7% 7.96 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.66% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 39.2 Reflection 31 Parallax 36.9 32% 35.7 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 36.2 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 90 90 132 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 59	73.9% Very good	Read 452 Write 423 Mixed 464 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 6.95 85% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 29.1 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 6.51 45% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 91%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 57GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 -101301098639418 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1094 (AB) Unknown 100 100 1 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 118 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 100 100 1 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BD) vendor-specific 37 76 51544588325 (C2) HDA temperature 37 76 51544588325 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 92 92 64424509440 (E9) Unknown 0 0 29924 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5672 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5672 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3547	27.1% Poor	Read 140 Write 66.7 Mixed 77.3 21% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.88 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 7.31 48% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 79.8 DQ Write 74.5 DQ Mixed 20.3 31% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 648GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 156 156 12893880476 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1655 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2969 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1006 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6122 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6122 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 219044315170 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	84.7% Excellent	Read 145 Write 150 Mixed 144 110% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.18 85% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 7,002 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.9% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 9.5 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	187x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	86x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	9x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	51x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,002 samples	64x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 4,871 samples	22x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 16GBSamsungBench 58%, 63 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16