Asus T101HA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus T101HA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T101HA
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160715
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 22 '18 at 22:01
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Memory 35
1-Core 14.4
2-Core 26.2
18% 25.2 Pts
4-Core 34.6
8-Core 39.3
5% 36.9 Pts
64-Core 39.2
2% 39.2 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 13A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4364
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 1.91
1% 1.72 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.39
2% 1.98 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4064 63GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
Read 137
Write 30.3
Mixed 60.5
16% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 7.51
4K Mixed 3.48
15% 5.13 MB/s
Generic SD32G SD Card 31GB
27GB free
Firmware: 3.0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 63.9
Write 13.2
Mixed 17
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.89
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.78
347% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback