Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '18 at 09:46
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89 20,692 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 94.4 1-Core 117 2-Core 233 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 599 61% 495 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3527) 1GB CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Lighting 17.6 Reflection 20.9 Parallax 15.8 14% 18.1 fps	MRender 24.3 Gravity 18 Splatting 20.5 17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 23 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 44 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 67 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 37 (F1) Unknown 99 99 302394092	67.5% Good	Read 324 Write 189 Mixed 218 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 35.1 119% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 70.7 70% 114 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 271GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 86 65847401 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11557 (05) Reallocated sector count 90 90 434 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 136184477 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5246 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5494 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 57 57 43 (BC) Unknown 100 92 163211313234 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 50 521273374 (C2) HDA temperature 30 50 68719476766 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 39 23 65847401 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 58420145178893 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1786630936 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1514260254	44.8% Average	Read 85.9 Write 70.2 Mixed 21.7 43% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.39 83% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 70%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 84GB free Firmware: VT100-50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 1 (03) Spinup time 253 253 6016 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 18873 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10419 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8762 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 786432 (BE) vendor-specific 157 94 27 (C2) HDA temperature 157 94 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 196175 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	32.7% Below average	Read 56 Write 57.7 Mixed 47.2 40% 53.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.33 76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 2x4GB 1,081 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	54.4% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.8 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 58.7 68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	444x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	357x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	117x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16