Medion ERAZER X7602 D/C482

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X7602 D/C482 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION P2A4-EM
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '18 at 09:34
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 72.4 1-Core 114 2-Core 218 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 810 76% 630 Pts	64-Core 1,233 76% 1,233 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Lighting 68.1 Reflection 67.7 Parallax 65.1 56% 67 fps	MRender 70.6 Gravity 65 Splatting 67.6 55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
120gb SSD 120GB 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1354 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 180 (A1) Unknown 100 100 0 (A4) Unknown 100 100 7880 (A5) Unknown 100 100 22 (A6) Unknown 100 100 5 (A7) Unknown 100 100 17 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2528 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1621 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (F5) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 0 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0 (FB) Unknown 100 100 0 (FC) Unknown 100 100 0 (FD) Unknown 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	58.7% Above average	Read 413 Write 279 Mixed 340 76% 344 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 61.5 4K Mixed 2.91 72% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 82.1 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 3.37 37% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 450GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 73409332 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3295 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 19367555 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15676 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1417 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 93 77323895026 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 25 172437405734 (C2) HDA temperature 38 75 60129542182 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 26 18 73409332 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -98380520867353 (F1) Unknown 100 253 376053861 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1862177191	56.3% Above average	Read 89.3 Write 107 Mixed 94.4 73% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.46 105% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 68%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 439GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 140 140 12896108700 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 208 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1437 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 180 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 229 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 229 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 163210067999 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.9% Good	Read 108 Write 105 Mixed 99.9 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.19 71% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB 7,811 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	64.2% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 20.8 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 25.3 SC Mixed 21.1 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 96 42% 96 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X7602 D/C482 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: Medion ERAZER X7602 D/C482

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x

SSD
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples	1x

RAM
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples	1x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $179

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16