Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-M WS (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170309
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '18 at 01:57
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Memory 96.8 1-Core 119 2-Core 239 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 866 83% 685 Pts	64-Core 1,074 66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1748 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.9 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 20.5 18% 19.9 fps	MRender 19 Gravity 20.5 Splatting 22.3 17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 350GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 162 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 262 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 52 48 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 98 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1885807498	82.6% Excellent	Read 505 Write 409 Mixed 419 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 20.4 100% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 19.5 60% 126 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 831GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 93 11208 (03) Spinup time 93 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4629 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 4311707960 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16444 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3247 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 104 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590131210 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 49 673054760 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 301 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 5331 (C2) HDA temperature 40 51 47244640296 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 12 3 11208 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -46608985080480 (F1) Unknown 100 253 601448194 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3814510814	56.8% Above average	Read 101 Write 97.5 Mixed 71.9 67% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.37 79% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB 1,302 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	MC Read 48.6 MC Write 50.6 MC Mixed 44.7 137% 48 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 22.4 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 50.9 79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	39x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	23x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	17x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	13x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x

SSD
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $210Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
M393A1G40DB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 99%, 225 samples	7x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	6x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $472

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16