Panasonic CF-C2ACAZV1M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Panasonic CF-C2ACAZV1M (all builds)
Motherboard	Panasonic CFC2-1
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12.0156 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130111
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '18 at 01:56
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3427U 4,182 User benchmarks, average bench 49% IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 84 1-Core 55.4 2-Core 117 54% 85.5 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 147 21% 153 Pts	64-Core 170 10% 170 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(10F7 8338) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 4.81 Parallax 2.81 3% 3.81 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 7.04 4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52 41,501 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 469GB free (System drive) Firmware: JE4OA50A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 95 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 252 100 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 9227 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3793 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 3033 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 386600599552 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4302045214 (BE) vendor-specific 67 35 539033633 (BF) G-sense error rate 12 12 22718 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3342387 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 74430 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	38.9% Below average	Read 69.7 Write 65.9 Mixed 74.2 53% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.17 54% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YH9 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 60GB 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 8192, 49152 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.5% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 11.3 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 9.9 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Panasonic CF-C2ACAZV1M

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)