Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 21 '18 at 23:19
Run Duration392 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 214
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 568
57% 464 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.1% Excellent
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 112
Parallax 96.1
81% 103 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 94.2
Splatting 96.6
78% 95.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 478
Write 341
Mixed 324
84% 381 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 17.2
113% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 37.7
DQ Write 55.7
DQ Mixed 17
21% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
3TB free
Firmware: 0102
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 153
Write 131
Mixed 87.9
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.91
4K Mixed 0.5
225% 2.81 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
2.5TB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 61%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 76%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
2.5TB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
332GB free
Firmware: 0102
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 103
Write 115
Mixed 109
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.32
96% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 16GB
10GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 5.04
Mixed 6.29
10% 10 MB/s
4K Read 7.23
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.007
27% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 29.3
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 23.8
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $293
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback