MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141105
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateJan 21 '18 at 21:01
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 196
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 630
59% 490 Pts
64-Core 808
50% 808 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8481) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 52.5
36% 45.5 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 37.2
37% 46.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe 256GB-$50
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 709
Write 550
Mixed 560
135% 606 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 31
116% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 77.5
95% 170 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 107%
Great: 131%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55
390GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 107
79% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.37
121% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59%
Great: 76%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
233GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65% Good
Read 115
Write 112
Mixed 83
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.24
92% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65%
Great: 83%
WD Re 2TB-$54
177GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 87.2
Write 85.2
Mixed 79.2
63% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.36
4K Mixed 0.42
115% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 83%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
150GB free
Firmware: 81.H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 99.8
Mixed 99.2
75% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
167% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 113%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55
90GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 96.4
Mixed 86.7
70% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.49
137% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$210
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM 3000 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 34.5
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 20.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $508
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback