Asus H170-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	99.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H170-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160127
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '18 at 17:17
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 112 2-Core 220 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 635 64% 518 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.6% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 131 Parallax 109 107% 124 fps	MRender 98.6 Gravity 122 Splatting 93.3 85% 105 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB 4,895 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 67GB free Firmware: SBFM11.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 939 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 118 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 93 93 109 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65538 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 17 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 200	63.4% Good	Read 310 Write 280 Mixed 293 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 89.4 4K Mixed 9.69 111% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 34.7 DQ Write 87.8 DQ Mixed 8.48 22% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 80%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 16405337 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 -112614042483309 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1446 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 98 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 43 64427327512 (C2) HDA temperature 24 43 64427327512 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 16405337 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 16405337 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 16405337 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 87 87 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 60872 (EA) Unknown 0 0 44338 (F1) Unknown 0 0 44338 (F2) Unknown 0 0 19251	66.2% Good	Read 467 Write 191 Mixed 254 67% 304 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 13.8 116% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 35.6 DQ Write 93.3 DQ Mixed 13 25% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 435GB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 147695880 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3911 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 90542530854 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 23779 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1879 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 83 83 17 (BE) vendor-specific 75 50 420544537 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 117 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 38 38 124063 (C2) HDA temperature 25 50 60129542169 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -27440546037712 (F1) Unknown 100 253 133512416020 (F2) Unknown 100 253 188548579187	83.9% Excellent	Read 148 Write 145 Mixed 116 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.21 63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FDD2 2x8GB 413 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.8% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 12.1 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	26x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	22x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	18x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	10x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	9x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	8x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
Burst 480GBPatriotBench 76%, 16,899 samples	5x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GBG.SKILL $30Bench 72%, 19,452 samples	8x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	6x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16