Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '18 at 20:48
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 97.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 414
55% 413 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Lighting 26.6
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 31.8
22% 27.6 fps
MRender 32.6
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 25.5
24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SH920 mSATA 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010BL00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 340
Write 139
Mixed 199
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 12.4
57% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 41.9
DQ Mixed 12.3
15% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 86%
Samsung SM841 mSATA 256GB
99GB free
Firmware: DXM44D6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 521
Write 412
Mixed 461
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 18.2
80% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 19.2
53% 104 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 99%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
68GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 469
Write 254
Mixed 131
62% 285 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 6.03
45% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 30.9
DQ Mixed 13.6
14% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
168GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49% Average
Read 80.1
Write 90.5
Mixed 86.7
65% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.29
83% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
110GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 76
Write 64.3
Mixed 79.3
55% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.47
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
92GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 95.7
Mixed 90.4
71% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.47
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
47GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 67.6
Write 77.3
Mixed 77.9
56% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.37
92% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25.2
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 21
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 47.8
84% 47.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback