| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock P55M Pro (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090910 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 20 '18 at 15:01 |
| Run Duration | 85 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71%
Very good
|
63% 102 Pts
|
38% 283 Pts
|
18% 283 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.52
|
4.94%
Terrible
|
5% 5.6 fps
|
4% 5.11 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
69.1%
Good
|
81% 109 MB/s
|
83% 0.79 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
|
42.7%
Average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
66% 60.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P55M Pro Builds (Compare 58 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock P55M Pro
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 21x |
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 15x |
| Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 4x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 4x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $151 |