Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '18 at 13:22
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 71.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 72% 131 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 663 66% 540 Pts	64-Core 837 52% 837 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.3% Above average	Lighting 64.3 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 59.6 52% 64.1 fps	MRender 70.2 Gravity 65.4 Splatting 66.2 55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 512GB-$74 4,600 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9757 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1410 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 504 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 92 92 243 (AE) Unknown 100 100 736 (B5) Unknown 100 100 4642876556086 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 8 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 149 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 20 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 92 92 8 (CE) Flying height 100 100 504	66.6% Good	Read 507 Write 249 Mixed 262 74% 339 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 11.3 90% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 11.8 38% 81.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 81%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 355GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 160 6783 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7975 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 26 26 54166 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 516 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7972 (C2) HDA temperature 129 102 21 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	43.2% Average	Read 77.5 Write 72.8 Mixed 62.6 53% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.28 81% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FDD2 2x8GB 413 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.5% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 25.4 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 22.6 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 97 41% 97 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)