Biostar TP55

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar TP55 (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100602
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '18 at 05:09
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 96.6 1-Core 94 2-Core 188 75% 126 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 432 49% 386 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1435) CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 124 Parallax 104 99% 116 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 109 Splatting 109 87% 106 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 33GB free Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5037 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 693 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 241 (AD) Unknown 100 100 524311 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 80 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 92 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2730	37.4% Below average	Read 223 Write 158 Mixed 144 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 6.73 61% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.9 DQ Write 46.7 DQ Mixed 6.63 13% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 97%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92 7,336 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0309 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14384 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2203 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 110 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 7640783848637 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 55 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	36.3% Below average	Read 226 Write 110 Mixed 146 35% 161 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 4.98 67% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 4.93 14% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 65%
Barracuda XT 4TB 539 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 499GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 65343194 (03) Spinup time 90 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6957 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 61 720122691 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19460 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2831 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 91 206161576017 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 59 31 54860306579497 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1042 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 84 84 33421 (C2) HDA temperature 41 69 -140737488355287 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 24 7 65343194 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 124163209569615 (F1) Unknown 100 253 51582633211 (F2) Unknown 100 253 153034659340	71.6% Very good	Read 127 Write 122 Mixed 115 91% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.49 115% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 420GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 167 6575 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2115 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4969 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 456 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 76 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 176 176 72100 (C2) HDA temperature 116 102 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	63.1% Good	Read 93.6 Write 126 Mixed 119 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.15 91% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 13.9 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.1 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 51.9 77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TP55 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TP55

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	5x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	3x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 460 SENvidiaBench 10%, 3,122 samples	2x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
MX300 525GBCrucial $150Bench 86%, 105,037 samples	2x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	4x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	4x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16