Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 128% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 122% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171229
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '18 at 21:14
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Memory 81.3 1-Core 144 2-Core 301 94% 175 Pts	4-Core 611 8-Core 991 98% 801 Pts	64-Core 1,237 76% 1,237 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Lighting 178 Reflection 187 Parallax 198 145% 188 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 180 Splatting 130 118% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 673GB free Firmware: R060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 373 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 21 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 6 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 74 61 167504838682 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 876133324 (F7) Unknown 100 100 27416070 (F8) Unknown 100 100 15391478 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4388 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	80.5% Excellent	Read 477 Write 342 Mixed 346 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 25.4 99% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 51.4 87% 172 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 269GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 1,790 Write 1,305 Mixed 1,223 319% 1,439 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 45.8 182% 62.2 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 132 149% 258 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 254%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 3780 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 6 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 6 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 184684511275 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 1 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 559 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	102% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 170 Mixed 151 126% 168 MB/s	4K Read 2.76 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.28 189% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3TB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 191 169 7408 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2481 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 199 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25301 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 705 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 285 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 19688 (C2) HDA temperature 114 105 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	62.5% Good	Read 115 Write 102 Mixed 99.8 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.23 92% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 242514232 (03) Spinup time 95 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6433 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 58 58 51548157793 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 32635 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 874 (B7) Unknown 96 96 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032835 (BD) vendor-specific 58 58 42 (BE) vendor-specific 65 49 537477054499 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 318 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 23566 (C2) HDA temperature 35 51 -140737488355293 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -811748801016 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9984011467 (F2) Unknown 100 253 21614047957	66.1% Good	Read 160 Write 71.2 Mixed 71.3 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.14 55% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 96%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 641GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 185 175 5708 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4846 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20906 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 738 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 315 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 188 188 38281 (C2) HDA temperature 113 103 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	77.2% Very good	Read 147 Write 122 Mixed 107 94% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.23 79% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 456GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 188 178 5575 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7558 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24138 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 997 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 339 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 32629 (C2) HDA temperature 114 105 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.1% Good	Read 103 Write 110 Mixed 103 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.2 81% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 317GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 133 126 6308 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12299 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 19 19 59131 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1406 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 454 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 175 175 76945 (C2) HDA temperature 109 100 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 21 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 19 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 21	40.3% Average	Read 72.8 Write 67.6 Mixed 71.7 53% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.18 64% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB 3,586 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 61.2 MC Mixed 27.8 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 11.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	119x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	80x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,145

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16