Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '18 at 20:54
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 85.5 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 197 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 335 50% 362 Pts	64-Core 398 25% 398 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Lighting 71.8 Reflection 70.2 Parallax 62.7 58% 68.3 fps	MRender 71.9 Gravity 69.7 Splatting 73.2 59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$22 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 223GB free Firmware: CS900211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 86 86 143 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6	85.3% Excellent	Read 505 Write 458 Mixed 484 108% 482 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 83.2 4K Mixed 8.4 97% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 13.6 70% 155 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 91%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1482 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 621 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 141 (AD) Unknown 100 100 983077 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 158 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4325	74.6% Very good	Read 498 Write 330 Mixed 338 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 9.98 85% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 47.8 86% 172 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 72 (03) Spinup time 128 128 12896633010 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1318 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1608 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 674 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2599 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2599 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 193274445853 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	87.8% Excellent	Read 156 Write 151 Mixed 166 119% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.21 79% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB 16,202 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 12.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	680x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	539x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	101x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	206x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	105x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	248x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	221x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16