Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateJan 19 '18 at 19:33
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 109
56% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 289
31% 246 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 8390) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 19.7
18% 22.3 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 23.6
20% 25.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ10.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 397
Write 77.5
Mixed 151
45% 208 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 9.15
4K Mixed 7.49
63% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 44.6
DQ Mixed 7.72
15% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
521GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 166
Write 90.6
Mixed 118
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.31
104% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
521GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 500GB
395GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 124
Mixed 119
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.14
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.46
148% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 78%
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
298GB free
Firmware: CC35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 77.5
Write 60.8
Mixed 82.6
56% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.34
93% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 71%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
298GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 91.3
Write 68.5
Mixed 72.5
58% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.4
96% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
101GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 87.7
Write 69.6
Mixed 77.4
59% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.44
111% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 13.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback