Asus P5Q PRO TURBO

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q PRO TURBO (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121008
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '18 at 15:11
Run Duration	90 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 81.8 1-Core 48.9 2-Core 97.4 49% 76 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 193 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB; GV-N105TD5-4GD CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	32.4% Below average	Lighting 40.9 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 38 33% 36.7 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 36.1 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 10 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (B4) Unknown 0 0 29 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 60 171798691878 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 135545824 (F7) Unknown 100 100 2306506 (F8) Unknown 100 100 859952	58.9% Above average	Read 267 Write 210 Mixed 219 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 57.9 4K Mixed 20.9 108% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 34.2 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 55.7 49% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 8.6 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q PRO TURBO Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P5Q PRO TURBO

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	18x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	16x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	9x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	9x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	8x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x

SSD
FireCuda 120 SSD ZA1000GM10001 1TBSeagateBench 114%, 477 samples	9x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
M500 240GBCrucial $54Bench 77%, 31,779 samples	5x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	52x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $501

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16