PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2103 x 1183 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150907 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 19 '18 at 13:41 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
CPU Throttled | 99% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
54.7%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
V Series SATA SSD 240GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
52.4%
Above average
|
|||
89.7%
Excellent
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 1866 CL9 Series000 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1600 MHz
|
30.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 19x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 10x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 5x |
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |