Notebook P377SM-A

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Notebook P377SM-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P377SM-A
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '18 at 11:34
Run Duration	429 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4910MQ-$110 6,703 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U40, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Memory 73.4 1-Core 34.5 2-Core 62.5 39% 56.8 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 162 18% 139 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 880M 2,147 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Clevo(1558 0376) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6191 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 28.1 Parallax 22.5 18% 24.3 fps	MRender 22.4 Gravity 12.6 Splatting 23.8 16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 259GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8091 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2454 (B1) Unknown 99 99 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 37 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 208 (EB) Unknown 99 99 98 (F1) Unknown 99 99 29563618882	92.1% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 491 Mixed 509 112% 499 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 36.2 123% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 69.8 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 60.3 54% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8101 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2449 (B1) Unknown 99 99 56 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 38 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 109 (F1) Unknown 99 99 56929364324	87.1% Excellent	Read 517 Write 494 Mixed 508 113% 506 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 67 4K Mixed 22 109% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 31.3 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 21.1 35% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 124%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2.5TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 22.9 Write 17 Mixed 20.6 25% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.24 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 55%
WDC WD60 EZRX-00MVLB1 6TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 21.8 Mixed 21 28% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.27 83% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 57%
SanDisk Ultra Backup 64GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 44GB free, PID 5535 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	8.72% Terrible	Read 20.1 Write 6.07 Mixed 9.23 13% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.56 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 1.21 95% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.72% Great: 12%
M4-CT128 M4SSD2 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 7GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.4% Below average	Read 22.8 Write 21.9 Mixed 22.3 29% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.72 4K Write 7.71 4K Mixed 3.51 406% 5.98 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-053.A00LF 4x8GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.2 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 13.2 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 93.8 43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P377SM-A Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Notebook P377SM-A

CPU
Core i7-4810MQIntel $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples	7x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	7x
Core i7-4710MQIntel $50Bench 60%, 15,557 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	9x
GTX 880MNvidiaBench 28%, 2,147 samples	6x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	4x

SSD
M500 mSATA 120GBCrucial $398Bench 59%, 916 samples	3x
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	2x
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 242%, 17,176 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 10,168 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	3x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 51%, 8,416 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 29% - Poor

Total price: $798

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16