HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '18 at 17:45
Run Duration633 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 95
2-Core 189
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 373
50% 371 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.1.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 31.5
22% 29.5 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 34.1
26% 30.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 522
Write 398
Mixed 421
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 17.8
96% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 56.2
64% 111 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
45GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 84.7
Write 70.4
Mixed 75.9
58% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.35
89% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
9GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 86.6
Write 62
Mixed 84.7
59% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.19
68% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 103%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
11GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 96.8
Write 17.5
Mixed 45.6
55% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.83
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.03
40% 2.72 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 859B CT51264BA160B.M16F 859B CT51264BA160B.M16F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.8% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback