MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '18 at 15:18
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 65.7 1-Core 96.8 2-Core 198 66% 120 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 517 53% 426 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.2 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.8% Very good	Lighting 84.5 Reflection 86.8 Parallax 159 69% 110 fps	MRender 85.8 Gravity 116 Splatting 128 92% 110 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 487GB free Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2639 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1042 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 29 (AE) Unknown 100 100 52 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 75 52 206159282201 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 303 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 12530420432 (F7) Unknown 100 100 420711094 (F8) Unknown 100 100 199748018 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1939 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	63.3% Good	Read 462 Write 330 Mixed 329 83% 374 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 17.1 68% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 29.9 DQ Mixed 9.57 27% 60.4 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 99%
Crucial BX200 960GB-$80 1,195 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 322GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 69 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 112 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 104 (A3) Unknown 100 100 1189 (94) Unknown 100 100 18471 (95) Unknown 100 100 180 (96) Unknown 100 100 27 (97) Unknown 100 100 135 (A4) Unknown 100 100 3869 (A5) Unknown 100 100 15 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 36413271703576 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 40664 (F2) Unknown 100 100 43761 (F5) Unknown 100 100 45702 (F6) Unknown 100 100 73884 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	55.8% Above average	Read 477 Write 245 Mixed 268 72% 330 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 33.5 4K Mixed 12.5 70% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 31.6 DQ Mixed 9.15 12% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator 2x16GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	76% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 25.8 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 22.4 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	31x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	20x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	8x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $683

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)