Casper EXCALIBUR E800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR E800  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Z170A TOMAHAWK (MS-7970)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161213
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 21:33
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 278
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 800
77% 636 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.5% Good
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 67.8
61% 73.2 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 72.9
59% 71.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-00000 256GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 492
Mixed 494
112% 500 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 32.2
177% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 124
155% 275 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 151
Mixed 167
125% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.15
70% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 1TB
44GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 68.1
Write 27.3
Mixed 36.3
49% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.25
69% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 43%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
14GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 5.57
Mixed 6.8
10% 8.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.66
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.32
29% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25.9
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 25.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXCALIBUR E800 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Casper EXCALIBUR E800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback