MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170920
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '18 at 13:05
Run Duration	621 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 66.8 1-Core 111 2-Core 192 69% 123 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 612 62% 501 Pts	64-Core 612 38% 612 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Lighting 27.7 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 33.1 23% 30.2 fps	MRender 26.1 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 35 23% 27.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 713 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 427 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 55 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 75 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3127851894	75.9% Very good	Read 502 Write 406 Mixed 415 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 17.6 90% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 59.1 DQ Mixed 53.2 52% 86 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 134%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 132 132 34388115891 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 400 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 482 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 244 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 400 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 400 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 176095100965 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	112% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 190 Mixed 99.7 120% 163 MB/s	4K Read 1.09 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.21 103% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 108%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 526GB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 114 Write 120 Mixed 73.3 129% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.38 48% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 58%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 143 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 372GB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 165 Write 137 Mixed 81.9 154% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.22 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 71%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 6,353 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 337GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 92.9 Write 102 Mixed 85.9 121% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.25 83% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 57%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB 572 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 1d00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	3.56% Terrible	Read 8.94 Write 4.59 Mixed 5.94 8% 6.49 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 20% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.56% Great: 5%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1f00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 3.98 Mixed 5.97 9% 8.76 MB/s	4K Read 9.12 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 35% 3.05 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 15,285 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.7% Very good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 26.3 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 23 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	102x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	100x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	83x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	76x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	65x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	64x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	27x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	67x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $400

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16