Hp-pavilion NE502AV-ABA a6750t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion NE502AV-ABA a6750t (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090506
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '18 at 05:15
Run Duration	1077 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59 18,604 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 65.1 1-Core 10.8 2-Core 22.5 27% 32.8 Pts	4-Core 29.5 8-Core 45.1 5% 37.3 Pts	64-Core 59.3 4% 59.3 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST380817AS 80GB-$130 2,079 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 53 46 200476848 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 249 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 25456966 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1099 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 277 (C2) HDA temperature 33 42 68719476769 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 52 49 155417539 (C5) Current pending sector count 130 100 4294967295 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 130 100 4294967295 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	27.2% Poor	Read 47.5 Write 47 Mixed 21.8 28% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.28 70% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 32%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 5TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 28.4 Write 22.6 Mixed 7.47 22% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.39 4K Write 3.79 4K Mixed 0.48 154% 2.22 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 75%
SanDisk Ultra 125GB 1,024 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 68GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.21% Terrible	Read 30.6 Write 3.83 Mixed 8.69 13% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.09 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.86 64% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.21% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 1 SC Mixed 0.6 2% 0.67 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion NE502AV-ABA a6750t

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)