Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Gigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF (all builds)
Memory	47.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20171003
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '18 at 01:42
Run Duration	403 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 77.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 897 79% 673 Pts	64-Core 1,810 112% 1,810 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 29.6 Reflection 34.5 Parallax 27.7 24% 30.6 fps	MRender 41.4 Gravity 29.6 Splatting 41 31% 37.3 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 313GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	288% Outstanding	Read 2,404 Write 1,817 Mixed 1,812 446% 2,011 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 62.5 217% 77.1 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 149 156% 259 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 353%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 286GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6127 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 879 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 43 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 133 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3903084421	73% Very good	Read 495 Write 94.8 Mixed 353 69% 314 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 27.8 127% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 81.7 95% 167 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 126%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 181GB free Firmware: 5.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 1357209691225 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2519 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 505 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10276 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7984 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7984 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6212	68.3% Good	Read 388 Write 215 Mixed 239 62% 281 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 17.7 101% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 61.2 91% 172 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 61%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 181GB free Firmware: 5.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4410024 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 86354612479231 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2495 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 498 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4410024 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4410024 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4410024 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2038 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1952 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1952 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5493	67.8% Good	Read 392 Write 207 Mixed 247 62% 282 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 74.8 4K Mixed 17.5 102% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 63.1 90% 168 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 61%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 166GB free Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5939 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 796 (B1) Unknown 99 99 12 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 56 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 305 (EB) Unknown 99 99 87 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5385417702	71.6% Very good	Read 463 Write 238 Mixed 245 69% 315 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 73.4 4K Mixed 13.1 96% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 30.8 81% 174 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 85%
Samsung PM851 M.2 2280 256GB 2,092 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT25D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 225 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B2) Unknown 100 1 0 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 4410 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2873196940 (F2) Unknown 99 99 2116367402	74.4% Very good	Read 498 Write 256 Mixed 344 81% 366 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 16.7 101% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 37.5 75% 153 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 131GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5916 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 530 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 54 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 42 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2763690472	104% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 412 Mixed 417 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 43.2 158% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 96.8 107% 183 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 163 6366 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7964 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20371 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1934 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 154 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7809 (C2) HDA temperature 119 103 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	79.2% Very good	Read 141 Write 135 Mixed 129 101% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 3.33 4K Mixed 0.65 170% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 154 154 34383200642 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1007 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3248 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 570 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1007 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1007 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 188979740704 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	77.1% Very good	Read 115 Write 154 Mixed 157 108% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.17 64% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 107%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 163 6466 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7751 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 22980 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1933 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 162 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7588 (C2) HDA temperature 117 103 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	72.4% Very good	Read 148 Write 105 Mixed 105 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 0.41 4K Mixed 0.31 67% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 85%
MUSHKIN MKNUFDAM32GB 32GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 8GB free, PID 5200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 161 Write 13.6 Mixed 18.4 52% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 8.88 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.65 92% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351 1,197 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	MC Read 70.3 MC Write 64.6 MC Mixed 69.3 194% 68.1 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 43.7 SC Mixed 28.1 88% 30.9 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 172%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 123%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 137%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	56x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	53x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	47x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	15x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $143Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	8x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 125%, 648 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GBCorsairBench 124%, 361 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $1,460

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16